gotcha, thanks for the suggestions!
and for James, and anyone else...
JamesDowning wrote:bartonmd wrote:All it will do is keep the flanges from folding under pressure.
AKA buckling
bartonmd wrote:To be honest, I don't know what I'd have that angled crossmember in there. What that does is take out 1.5" that the skid can flex before it hits the trans pan, and it doesn't add a whole lot to the strength of the skid. The ones that add all the strength are the ones at the sides. What would be as strong as anything, would be to gusset the side strips, so they don't fold over and lose strength when the skid is hit.
Mike
ErikSS wrote:bartonmd wrote:To be honest, I don't know what I'd have that angled crossmember in there. What that does is take out 1.5" that the skid can flex before it hits the trans pan, and it doesn't add a whole lot to the strength of the skid. The ones that add all the strength are the ones at the sides. What would be as strong as anything, would be to gusset the side strips, so they don't fold over and lose strength when the skid is hit.
Mike
This is the kind of thing that I gain the most from on this Forum. I would find the x concept to add the Most possible strength to the skid. However, I've installed some of Barton's product and therefore aware that I should take his advice seriously. lol I believe in the gussets, and understand his point about the 1 1/2" reduction. I'm picturing something hard hitting it in the middle buckling it even with gussets if you don't have anything going across it.
ErikSS <<< LEARNING!
mikekey wrote:Did you ever get those dimensions?
mikekey wrote:Yeah, it's there, I had a noobie moment.
What's the thickness of the steel you used?