MrSmithsTB wrote:I an running worn Destinations and they still perform incredibly well. I found a place to purchase them new online for quite a good price. Saving for new ones in pairs.
Assuming you are looking for 265/75/16:
https://www.roadwaywholesaletire.com/index.htm
MrSmithsTB wrote:245/75/16 and 265/70/16 are pretty much the same. Which should fit without spacers. If you plan on buying spacers, your option will be opened up a bit. But most mod you might have to do with the 265/70 is grind the upper ball joint a little. If you elect not to use spacers, I would actually recommend you keep the size and go for a mud terrain or aggressive all terrain tread. For example:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/4-LT-245-75-R-16-10-PLY-MAXXIS-BIGHORN-MUD-TERRAIN-OWL_W0QQcmdZViewItemQQhashZitem3a5427faf7QQitemZ250520009463QQptZMotorsQ5fCarQ5fTruckQ5fPartsQ5fAccessories
Shipped to your door for around $600. And that is a good set of NEW tires.
NickNorie wrote:MrSmithsTB wrote:245/75/16 and 265/70/16 are pretty much the same. Which should fit without spacers. If you plan on buying spacers, your option will be opened up a bit. But most mod you might have to do with the 265/70 is grind the upper ball joint a little. If you elect not to use spacers, I would actually recommend you keep the size and go for a mud terrain or aggressive all terrain tread. For example:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/4-LT-245-75-R-16-10-PLY-MAXXIS-BIGHORN-MUD-TERRAIN-OWL_W0QQcmdZViewItemQQhashZitem3a5427faf7QQitemZ250520009463QQptZMotorsQ5fCarQ5fTruckQ5fPartsQ5fAccessories
Shipped to your door for around $600. And that is a good set of NEW tires.
I am retarded when it comes to tires. Which is wider?? 245 or 265?? and which is taller?? i dont mind grinding the bj but for now no spacers. And its looking kike i might get those tires you posted
265 is wider than 245. That number denotes the tire width in mm. The 75 or 70 or 65, etc.... is the percentage of the width that is the sidewall height. Both of those tire equal to about 30.5", give or take. With the 265 being wider, it has a better chance of experiencing ball joint interference, but I think it is worth it for the extra inch of width. Remember though, the footprint(tread width on the pavement) of the tire varies with different brands and tread ratings(A/T or M/T), which also affects how close it comes to the ball joint. I'd prefer the 265/70/16 given the choice between the two, because it allows for a better spread of weight distribution for softer terrain, and an M/T tread, for better traction in the messy stuff.
NickNorie wrote:Hmmmmmmmmm now its between the MT/R with kevlar and the firestone............ MT/R has a 50 dollar rebate, meaning in the long run I pay 646 Vs 660 for the Firestone, before shipping of course.
OregTrailBlazin wrote:NickNorie wrote:Hmmmmmmmmm now its between the MT/R with kevlar and the firestone............ MT/R has a 50 dollar rebate, meaning in the long run I pay 646 Vs 660 for the Firestone, before shipping of course.
Your not letting 14$ sway your decision, are you?
Philberto wrote:
Philberto wrote:Here's the website... A lot of people on ExPo and Pirate4x4 swear by them: http://www.innovativebalancing.com/index.html
Zero wrote:just try the mt/r 's you'll never really know how good anything is until you try it where you drive it.