chevycrew wrote:I"m surprised to see all the praise of the g-80 among the TB owners. I have always known it as the gov-bomb... cuz eventually, get a spot of high wheel speed, it locks in, and BOOM!
chevycrew wrote:I"m surprised to see all the praise of the g-80 among the TB owners. I have always known it as the gov-bomb... cuz eventually, get a spot of high wheel speed, it locks in, and BOOM!
chevycrew wrote:Hey now, I drive like that!
There is a reason I went to 1 tons, and am worried about the stock dana 60 front shafts...
That being said, I intentionally put rear axles with G-80s in both of the other trucks. It was cheaper to get a wrecking yard axle with the g-80, than without.
But those are full float 14 bolts, with 37's, and 40's. One of ours wont lock in offroad till the wheel speed is back down, (spinning up a gravel hill, grab the brakes it locks in, then up you go.)
chevycrew wrote:Hey now, I drive like that!
There is a reason I went to 1 tons, and am worried about the stock dana 60 front shafts...
I always engage mine at low speed and with a careful foot. THEN apply throttle. Letting the spinning tire build up a lot of momentum is driving with impatience, IMHO.chevycrew wrote:...get a spot of high wheel speed, it locks in, and BOOM!
SteveTB03 wrote:Weren't you also pulling the van in reverse whenbthe rear blew?
fishsticks wrote:SteveTB03 wrote:Weren't you also pulling the van in reverse whenbthe rear blew?
Reverse doesn't matter so much to the G80 as it does to the ring and pinion. You're applying a lot of pressure to the coast side of the gears when pulling backwards.
The G80 engages the same either way.
SteveTB03 wrote:Oh ok I always heard Its not good to pull anybody out in reverse as things could explode on you.
bartonmd wrote:SteveTB03 wrote:Oh ok I always heard Its not good to pull anybody out in reverse as things could explode on you.
Actually, it's the opposite, generally... The rear axle is almost always stronger than the front, and the front is almost always powering the coast side of the gear (going forward)... In fact, a guy that I went to Purdue with had an internship at Dana, and he told me that because of this, if you're going to pull somebody in 4WD (and the front end weighs more than the rear. i.e. unloaded truck or TB), do it in reverse, so you are on the drive side of the weak front end, and the coast side of the stronger rear end...
Mike
fishsticks wrote:bartonmd wrote:
Actually, it's the opposite, generally... The rear axle is almost always stronger than the front, and the front is almost always powering the coast side of the gear (going forward)... In fact, a guy that I went to Purdue with had an internship at Dana, and he told me that because of this, if you're going to pull somebody in 4WD (and the front end weighs more than the rear. i.e. unloaded truck or TB), do it in reverse, so you are on the drive side of the weak front end, and the coast side of the stronger rear end...
Mike
We have reverse cut ring/pinion gears however, so for 360's that is not true.
bartonmd wrote:We don't power the front gears on the coast side while moving forward??? Seems like we would, given the AWD vehicles in this platform...
Mike
JamesDowning wrote: Which begs the question - why would they reverse the front gears?