The XUV is indeed a two-way swinging hatch. (Like it was designed in the late 60's. )janesy86 wrote:..does the XUV hav a swinging rear hatch? .
If you can while you're back there, try getting a weight reading of the door itself without the struts attached. If we can find out the pressure they need to have to hold the door up we can figure the extra percentage of force needed when the tire is attached. Which will vary depending on the height of the tire in regards to where it's placed compared to the hinges.Philberto wrote:I will be working around the back of my TB tomorrow measuring for a secret project, so I may take off the lift gate panels and see what (if any) structural support is there... Another option is to mount the tire to a frame (similar to an exoskeleton, but just for the liftgate) and attach the frame using a separate pair of struts and hinges... Lots of fabrication, but since it'll be reinforced by the liftgate, maybe could get away with using 3/4" DOM... Time to find someone who can work me up a model in Solidworks or Inventor and run an FEA on it.
Can anyone find the error in this statement?bgwolfpack wrote:If you can while you're back there, try getting a weight reading of the door itself without the struts attached. If we can find out the pressure they need to have to hold the door up we can figure the extra percentage of force needed when the tire is attached. Which will vary depending on the height of the tire in regards to where it's placed compared to the hinges.Philberto wrote:I will be working around the back of my TB tomorrow measuring for a secret project, so I may take off the lift gate panels and see what (if any) structural support is there... Another option is to mount the tire to a frame (similar to an exoskeleton, but just for the liftgate) and attach the frame using a separate pair of struts and hinges... Lots of fabrication, but since it'll be reinforced by the liftgate, maybe could get away with using 3/4" DOM... Time to find someone who can work me up a model in Solidworks or Inventor and run an FEA on it.
One other option for the weight issue would be a block & tackle style balancer that could be placed in the recess area next to, or instead of, the existing struts. One pulling while closed and one pulling when open.
bgwolfpack wrote:Here's one I found to contemplate.
If you look real close at the right sides helper strut I believe it's on a different angle than the left. It very well may be a shaft stuck into position and out of the shot, or hiding it.
Philberto wrote:wow... that is some seriously beefy tubing... I may skip the ladder and just worry about the tire mount lol, because that has to weigh as much as 3 tires by my estimation.
Saxis wrote:That looks way too high also, but any lower/centered and that tire would be blocking either the tail-light, the hatch handle or both...
Tell more about where the hinges would go. You can not hinge off the roof body, without the bottom points of the rack being able to floot.Philberto wrote:Saxis wrote:That looks way too high also, but any lower/centered and that tire would be blocking either the tail-light, the hatch handle or both...
The hatch handle issue could be remedied with a solenoid if really necessary, and one of those "door poppers."
Or, I could always just mount another handle somewhere and figure that out...
-edit: Looking at it, I think I would run the tube in an "X" pattern, centering the tire on the rear and anchoring at all 4 corners or using a second pair of hinges up top... will look after work tomorrow, since I'm working a 12 today.