Jrgunn5150 wrote:The only hold up with lifting the rear is the tires get into the doors, you'll need longer control arms.
Rickalicka18 wrote:I am no expert by any means for this type of stuff, but looking at the specs of the dana 44 and the dana 60, I have to agree with Mike on using the dana 60. Weight wise, you'll probably be okay using the dana 44, but what would worry me is the amount of torque being put through the axle (approximately 440 ft-lbs at 1,800rpm) would be too much torque for that axle to handle. I would just go with a dana 60, because it will handle everything with ease.
HARDTRAILZ wrote:Dana 44 is better than most of us run anyway, so go for it. You can always swap it out later.
HARDTRAILZ wrote:I would not run it and i doubt you could do it with the height you need for oil pan clearance anyway.
You realize the 35s you want to run will look small with the basic amount of lift needed to clear the SA right?
HARDTRAILZ wrote:I would not run it and i doubt you could do it with the height you need for oil pan clearance anyway.
You realize the 35s you want to run will look small with the basic amount of lift needed to clear the SA right?
adharding wrote:HARDTRAILZ wrote:I would not run it and i doubt you could do it with the height you need for oil pan clearance anyway.
You realize the 35s you want to run will look small with the basic amount of lift needed to clear the SA right?
Yeah. It's part of the reason why I've been hesitant on pulling the trigger on the SA. I was planning a custom IFS with the 3500 9.25", but $$$$. I guess I'll just have to suck it up and put big boy tires. Lol
adharding wrote:I think the 44 will do for now. I'm installing my 6.5 in its NA form, and it only weighs 200 lbs more than the 4.2. But then again I could just keep it gas. I still haven't 100% decided on parting out my dually for this project yet.