Offroad Trailblazers and Envoys

EXT Front Brake Swap

BDS, ReadyLift, Smaxx... You name it, we know about it here.

by fishsticks » Sat Oct 06, 2012 4:15 pm

Finally got around to this. Stupid simple. Just buy EXT front caliper brackets and rotors. Your existing calipers work and the brake pads are the same.

Also changed out front hubs and rotated tires. Whole job took maybe an hour and a half at a leisurely pace. One bracket that had a pin hole that wasn't drilled correctly so I had to clean it up on the press as well.

Image

Image


It takes a lot less pedal to slow the truck down now. If you have to replace your front brakes, spend the extra 25 per side and do this.
11 Silverado LTZ - 6.2L/6l80, 2/3 drop, self tuned
85 Hilux - 3RZ, dual cases, caged, 40s, chromo everything
02 TrailBlazer LTZ - 35s, lockers, balls - Gone but not forgotten - Build
User avatar
fishsticks
Moderator
 
Posts: 4356
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:30 pm
Location: WA, Vancouver
Name: Donny
Vehicle Year: Other
Vehicle: Other Vehicle
DriveTrain: 4WD w/ Aftermarket Locker
Rank: Extreme Offroader

by NC_IslandRunner » Sat Oct 06, 2012 4:25 pm

Awesome, how much larger are the EXT rotors?
IF THE FISH STOP BITING... HUNT FOR SHELLS!!!
User avatar
NC_IslandRunner
Moderator
 
Posts: 3021
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 4:49 pm
Location: NC, Sanford
Name: Rory
Vehicle Year: 2004
Vehicle: Chevrolet TrailBlazer
DriveTrain: 4WD w/ G80
Rank: Offroad Rated

by JCrayton99 » Sat Oct 06, 2012 4:50 pm

x2. can we get a wheel center to outter most of the caliper dimension?
JCrayton99
Trail-Blazer
 
Posts: 428
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 6:44 pm
Location: CT, South Windsor
Name: John Crayton
Vehicle Year: 2004
Vehicle: Chevrolet TrailBlazer
DriveTrain: 4WD w/ G80
Rank: Offroad Guide

by fishsticks » Sat Oct 06, 2012 8:42 pm

Rotors are 13 inches across. EXT brakes require 17 inch wheels I believe.
11 Silverado LTZ - 6.2L/6l80, 2/3 drop, self tuned
85 Hilux - 3RZ, dual cases, caged, 40s, chromo everything
02 TrailBlazer LTZ - 35s, lockers, balls - Gone but not forgotten - Build
User avatar
fishsticks
Moderator
 
Posts: 4356
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:30 pm
Location: WA, Vancouver
Name: Donny
Vehicle Year: Other
Vehicle: Other Vehicle
DriveTrain: 4WD w/ Aftermarket Locker
Rank: Extreme Offroader

by JCrayton99 » Sat Oct 06, 2012 8:59 pm

So its not like 15" rims on swb?
JCrayton99
Trail-Blazer
 
Posts: 428
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 6:44 pm
Location: CT, South Windsor
Name: John Crayton
Vehicle Year: 2004
Vehicle: Chevrolet TrailBlazer
DriveTrain: 4WD w/ G80
Rank: Offroad Guide

by fishsticks » Sat Oct 06, 2012 10:00 pm

JCrayton99 wrote:So its not like 15" rims on swb?



I think 16" wheels might be doable with a little grinding on the caliper. I can get my thumb in between the caliper and the inside of the wheel on mine.
11 Silverado LTZ - 6.2L/6l80, 2/3 drop, self tuned
85 Hilux - 3RZ, dual cases, caged, 40s, chromo everything
02 TrailBlazer LTZ - 35s, lockers, balls - Gone but not forgotten - Build
User avatar
fishsticks
Moderator
 
Posts: 4356
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:30 pm
Location: WA, Vancouver
Name: Donny
Vehicle Year: Other
Vehicle: Other Vehicle
DriveTrain: 4WD w/ Aftermarket Locker
Rank: Extreme Offroader

by bartonmd » Sat Oct 06, 2012 11:27 pm

So, what do you think about them, after driving your TB with them on?

Mike
bartonmd
Moderator
 
Posts: 4469
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:35 am
Location: IN, Indianapolis
Name: Mike
Vehicle Year: 2007
Vehicle: Chevrolet TrailBlazer
DriveTrain: 4WD w/ G80
Rank: Offroad Rated

by fishsticks » Sat Oct 06, 2012 11:29 pm

bartonmd wrote:So, what do you think about them, after driving your TB with them on?

Mike



I feel a lot better about the idea of towing the Yota behind this thing through the hills.
11 Silverado LTZ - 6.2L/6l80, 2/3 drop, self tuned
85 Hilux - 3RZ, dual cases, caged, 40s, chromo everything
02 TrailBlazer LTZ - 35s, lockers, balls - Gone but not forgotten - Build
User avatar
fishsticks
Moderator
 
Posts: 4356
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:30 pm
Location: WA, Vancouver
Name: Donny
Vehicle Year: Other
Vehicle: Other Vehicle
DriveTrain: 4WD w/ Aftermarket Locker
Rank: Extreme Offroader

by JCrayton99 » Sun Oct 07, 2012 12:22 am

Ive been wanting to do this for a while. Maybe ill buy the bracket and test fit it before I buy rotors and breaks...
JCrayton99
Trail-Blazer
 
Posts: 428
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 6:44 pm
Location: CT, South Windsor
Name: John Crayton
Vehicle Year: 2004
Vehicle: Chevrolet TrailBlazer
DriveTrain: 4WD w/ G80
Rank: Offroad Guide

by navigator » Mon Oct 08, 2012 9:22 am

I know I don't understand what things cost to MFG but it woulds seem to me that if you developed a rotor and pad for an EXT, it would be cheaper to use those rotors and pads on all the TBs instead of designing a different one for the SWB models.

Same thing with the rear ends, I would think it would be cheaper to use the common 8.6 rear in all of the TBs instead of developing a different one in the SWB I6 models.
"Please consider a search before posting. Folks on this site PIONEERED functional offroad use of these trucks."
The answer to many common lift questions can be found
here
My Build Thread
User avatar
navigator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4651
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 10:16 am
Location: NC, Winnabow
Name: Chris
Vehicle Year: 2006
Vehicle: Chevrolet TrailBlazer
DriveTrain: 4WD
Rank: Trail Ready

by HARDTRAILZ » Mon Oct 08, 2012 10:17 am

navigator wrote:I know I don't understand what things cost to MFG but it woulds seem to me that if you developed a rotor and pad for an EXT, it would be cheaper to use those rotors and pads on all the TBs instead of designing a different one for the SWB models.

Same thing with the rear ends, I would think it would be cheaper to use the common 8.6 rear in all of the TBs instead of developing a different one in the SWB I6 models.


Wow.

Smaller parts are cheaper and adequate for 99% of users. Pretty simple to understand. Surprised they bothered to upsize parts for lwb really.
I hate to advocate weird chemicals, alcohol, violence or insanity to anyone...but
they've always worked for me.
User avatar
HARDTRAILZ
Moderator
 
Posts: 6342
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 1:49 am
Location: IN, Batesville
Name: Kyle
Vehicle Year: 2006
Vehicle: Chevrolet TrailBlazer
DriveTrain: 4WD w/ Aftermarket Locker
Rank: Extreme Offroader

by fishsticks » Mon Oct 08, 2012 11:52 am

The 8.6 is a parts-bin rear axle: Development costs are already mostly paid for by the the full size lineup. The reasoning behind the 8.0 can only be one thing: CAFE standards. There's no way it was cheaper to commission an entirely new axle/differential for use just in the 360s.

As for brakes, wheel fitment is the issue there. 17" wheels were an upsell for the 360 line. Smaller brakes fit in smaller wheels which are less expensive to manufacture. The EXT likely needed bigger brakes to meet certain DOT requirements.
11 Silverado LTZ - 6.2L/6l80, 2/3 drop, self tuned
85 Hilux - 3RZ, dual cases, caged, 40s, chromo everything
02 TrailBlazer LTZ - 35s, lockers, balls - Gone but not forgotten - Build
User avatar
fishsticks
Moderator
 
Posts: 4356
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:30 pm
Location: WA, Vancouver
Name: Donny
Vehicle Year: Other
Vehicle: Other Vehicle
DriveTrain: 4WD w/ Aftermarket Locker
Rank: Extreme Offroader

by navigator » Mon Oct 08, 2012 12:24 pm

fishsticks wrote:The 8.6 is a parts-bin rear axle: Development costs are already mostly paid for by the the full size lineup. The reasoning behind the 8.0 can only be one thing: CAFE standards. There's no way it was cheaper to commission an entirely new axle/differential for use just in the 360s.

.......this is kind of what I was thinking.

I'm also thinking the difference in material cost in the item itself is negligible compared to the research and tooling cost.
I understand if it costs $800k to develop something but yet you save $1 on a million vehicles it makes sense. I also understand that when you save weight you also get better MPG as well. I'm just not sure in these instances there is enough difference to justify the cost.

Looking at GMPartsdirect the EXT rotor (+$20) and caliper mount (+$1) are more expensive(MSRP) but that is if you walk into the dealer to buy it. I don't think the EXT rotor costs $20 more to make.

The caliper mount and rotor for a Silverado are actually cheaper than the one for either TB and I expect the one for the Silverado to be equivalent or even heavier than the one for the EXT.

If they made every TB with the Silverado brakes and 8.6 rear would they be that much heavier or that much more expensive to make? I don't think so.

Don't get me started on our red headed step child of a bolt pattern either....

I know you never improve a product if you don't change it but I think if you have the same engine, xfercase, tranny, rear end, brakes, wheels etc on the Silverado 1500, Tahoe, 1500 Suburburban and Trailblazer(except width differences) you are going to be more efficient in your processing and need less inventory as a dealer to keep spare parts for all the platforms.
"Please consider a search before posting. Folks on this site PIONEERED functional offroad use of these trucks."
The answer to many common lift questions can be found
here
My Build Thread
User avatar
navigator
Moderator
 
Posts: 4651
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 10:16 am
Location: NC, Winnabow
Name: Chris
Vehicle Year: 2006
Vehicle: Chevrolet TrailBlazer
DriveTrain: 4WD
Rank: Trail Ready

by bartonmd » Mon Oct 08, 2012 1:07 pm

navigator wrote:
fishsticks wrote:The 8.6 is a parts-bin rear axle: Development costs are already mostly paid for by the the full size lineup. The reasoning behind the 8.0 can only be one thing: CAFE standards. There's no way it was cheaper to commission an entirely new axle/differential for use just in the 360s.

.......this is kind of what I was thinking.

I'm also thinking the difference in material cost in the item itself is negligible compared to the research and tooling cost.
I understand if it costs $800k to develop something but yet you save $1 on a million vehicles it makes sense. I also understand that when you save weight you also get better MPG as well. I'm just not sure in these instances there is enough difference to justify the cost.

Looking at GMPartsdirect the EXT rotor (+$20) and caliper mount (+$1) are more expensive(MSRP) but that is if you walk into the dealer to buy it. I don't think the EXT rotor costs $20 more to make.

The caliper mount and rotor for a Silverado are actually cheaper than the one for either TB and I expect the one for the Silverado to be equivalent or even heavier than the one for the EXT.

If they made every TB with the Silverado brakes and 8.6 rear would they be that much heavier or that much more expensive to make? I don't think so.

Don't get me started on our red headed step child of a bolt pattern either....

I know you never improve a product if you don't change it but I think if you have the same engine, xfercase, tranny, rear end, brakes, wheels etc on the Silverado 1500, Tahoe, 1500 Suburburban and Trailblazer(except width differences) you are going to be more efficient in your processing and need less inventory as a dealer to keep spare parts for all the platforms.



All the differential housings for the TB are aluminum (vs. steel for everybody else, for unsprung weight, as well as vehicle weight, I'd guess, since we don't heed the strength), and the lengths are different than the the full size, because we are narrower than them. So basically, the only parts that cross over are the bearings, gears, and carriers, anyway.

The TB was a BIG seller for them, and the bigger of a seller something is, the more it affects your CAFE. The smaller axle has lighter shafts, carrier, and gears. The smaller brakes save weight, but more importantly than that, they get rotating weight closer to the axis of rotation, so they are easier to spin up. The smaler brakes let you run smaller, lighter wheels, and let you up-sell the larger wheels, both lowering your base price and your fuel useage.

Unequal length half shafts contribute pretty heavily to torque steer when you're in 4WD, and you don't want a soccer mom vehicle that's unstable in the snow.

These parts that are smaller are ordered in such high quanity that you don't really lose out on the quanity discount by having a different part, but you do save a few cents each in less material, and much MUCH more importantly, they save you fuel on a big selling vehicle, which allows you to sell more big vehicles without having to lose money by heavily discounting (and losing money on) your little cars, so you can still meet your CAFE.

Mike
bartonmd
Moderator
 
Posts: 4469
Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:35 am
Location: IN, Indianapolis
Name: Mike
Vehicle Year: 2007
Vehicle: Chevrolet TrailBlazer
DriveTrain: 4WD w/ G80
Rank: Offroad Rated

by KE7WOX » Mon Oct 08, 2012 5:38 pm

Hmmmmmm. This looks like a good idea now that I'll have to do my brakes soon.

On a sidenote, are the rear brakes the same?
This is an aggressive post. You probably won’t like it. It is quite doubtful that you have the taste or sophistication to be able to appreciate a post of this quality and depth.

Build Thread
User avatar
KE7WOX
Veteran
 
Posts: 1226
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 2:10 pm
Location: OH, Dublin (Columbus)
Name: Felipe G
Vehicle Year: 2004
Vehicle: Chevrolet TrailBlazer
DriveTrain: 4WD

by fishsticks » Mon Oct 08, 2012 5:50 pm

KE7WOX wrote:Hmmmmmm. This looks like a good idea now that I'll have to do my brakes soon.

On a sidenote, are the rear brakes the same?



Yep, same on both models.
11 Silverado LTZ - 6.2L/6l80, 2/3 drop, self tuned
85 Hilux - 3RZ, dual cases, caged, 40s, chromo everything
02 TrailBlazer LTZ - 35s, lockers, balls - Gone but not forgotten - Build
User avatar
fishsticks
Moderator
 
Posts: 4356
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2010 11:30 pm
Location: WA, Vancouver
Name: Donny
Vehicle Year: Other
Vehicle: Other Vehicle
DriveTrain: 4WD w/ Aftermarket Locker
Rank: Extreme Offroader

by JCrayton99 » Sat Oct 13, 2012 12:59 pm

I went ahead and did it. with MarkMCs spacers and wheels with 4" backspacing I was able to clear the EXT breaks. They are a smaller diameter on the outboard side and the rim ends right there. I have a touch over 1/4" clearance between everything. Such a great upgrade.

So 17" rim, or 16" with spacers and 4" or (less? More?) backspacing.
JCrayton99
Trail-Blazer
 
Posts: 428
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 6:44 pm
Location: CT, South Windsor
Name: John Crayton
Vehicle Year: 2004
Vehicle: Chevrolet TrailBlazer
DriveTrain: 4WD w/ G80
Rank: Offroad Guide

by JCrayton99 » Sat Oct 20, 2012 4:08 pm

Late on photos.
Attachments
uploadfromtaptalk1350763760050.jpg
uploadfromtaptalk1350763752271.jpg
uploadfromtaptalk1350763741371.jpg
JCrayton99
Trail-Blazer
 
Posts: 428
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 6:44 pm
Location: CT, South Windsor
Name: John Crayton
Vehicle Year: 2004
Vehicle: Chevrolet TrailBlazer
DriveTrain: 4WD w/ G80
Rank: Offroad Guide

by Beamer » Sun Nov 25, 2012 10:31 am

How much taller is the EXT caliper bracket than the SWB bracket? Would like to do the upgrade with 16" stock wheels, just want to see if I need to get wheel spacers also.
User avatar
Beamer
Member
 
Posts: 84
Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 9:33 pm
Location: MD, Westminster
Name: Chris Beam
Vehicle Year: 2003
Vehicle: Chevrolet TrailBlazer
DriveTrain: 4WD w/ G80
Rank: Trail Ready

by JCrayton99 » Sun Nov 25, 2012 11:50 am

It would not work with stock wheels. If you want to stay with 16" rims, you need to have 4" of backspacing or less on top of the 1.5" adapters. Mine just barely fit, maybe 1/4" of gap at the most.
JCrayton99
Trail-Blazer
 
Posts: 428
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 6:44 pm
Location: CT, South Windsor
Name: John Crayton
Vehicle Year: 2004
Vehicle: Chevrolet TrailBlazer
DriveTrain: 4WD w/ G80
Rank: Offroad Guide

Next

Return to Lifts / Suspension